Recent Articles

Follow Us
  >  

In my post last week, I explained the risk of residing in an assisted living facility (ALF), running out of money but being too healthy to meet Medicaid’s medical test.  If the applicant is still only paying the basic room and board cost and not for any care when the money runs out, a Medicaid application will fail for failure to show the need for long term care. On the other hand, some cases are not that clear cut.  One such case resulted in our filing a Medicaid application.  The client sold her home and used the proceeds to pay for care in an ALF for 4+ years.  Her family reached out to us within months of the funds running out.  Her care was above the base level but she was not exactly cooperative in the decisions to provide for her needs.  She insisted that she was fine and didn’t need the care she was receiving.  Furthermore, because she still had her mental capabilities, she was able to clearly communicate with the Medicaid nurse conducting the evaluation.   It was a close call but we filed the Medicaid application.  We were able to satisfy all the financial requirements, however, the application was denied because Medicaid determined that she did not meet

In my blog post last week, I explained the risk of not satisfying Medicaid’s medical test when residing in an assisted living facility (ALF) as opposed to a nursing home.   Assisted living residents do not typically need nursing home level care when they first enter a facility.  While this may be expected to occur over time, it is not guaranteed that it will happen by the time they run out of money.   As I explained last week , families are often confused by the discussion about Medicaid during the admissions process.  “Private pay for 2 years - or in some cases 3 years - and we will agree to make a Medicaid slot available”, the ALF says, “provided that a slot is available.”  They understand that to mean that as long as they meet the financial obligation, Medicaid will follow.  But, what if it doesn’t follow? Over the years, we have had many an instance in which we speak to families considering a move to an ALF who may not have enough funds to cover the cost before Medicaid eligibility.  In some cases, the potential resident doesn’t have enough funds to even meet the 2 or 3 year private pay requirement.  In that case the families tell me they

In my blog post last week, I began a discussion about Medicaid’s medical test.  While the financial requirements to qualify for Medicaid are extensive and involve “looking back” through 5 years of financial transaction, we cannot forget that there is also a medical requirement of needing nursing home level care. As I explained last week, this is never a problem when the applicant is living in a nursing home and applying for Medicaid.  No one resides in a nursing home who doesn’t need to be there.  Assisted living facilities (ALFs) however, are trickier.  That’s because they are not licensed as nursing homes and therefore, not all residents need nursing home level care.   In fact, the majority of assisted living residents do not need nursing home level care when they first enter a facility.  Over time, as their health declines, they need increased care.  The concern, however, is that a resident may run out of money before he or she meets the medical test for Medicaid.   When families are looking for a facility in which to place a loved one and then engage with the facility regarding the financial terms, a discussion about Medicaid typically happens.  Most ALFs have a 2 year or 3 year private pay requirement before they will

When families call our office to inquire about Medicaid, the conversation tends to focus mostly on my explanation of the financial requirements.  People generally understand that Medicaid is a needs based benefit with an income test and an asset test.  The State’s scrutiny of an applicant’s finances over a 5 year period leading up to the application is detailed.  It tends to overwhelm families if they are not prepared for it. At some point during the conversation, however, I always remind families that there is a medical requirement that we cannot overlook.  Even if you spend down your assets and provide each and every document that is requested, if you are “too healthy” to qualify it doesn’t matter that you have satisfied the financial test.  Only when you need “nursing home level” care do you satisfy the medical requirement. The medical test is defined in terms of the activities of daily living (ADLs).  Those activities are ambulating, bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding oneself, and incontinence.  One must show the need for assistance with at least 3 of ADLs to meet the test of needing nursing home level care.  This is established by Medicaid who sends a nurse to conduct an evaluation and issue a report.  If the test is met, a medical

In my blog last week I began talking about payable on death designations.  Wife died and 10 days later Husband died.  Neither spouse had left a will but Wife had designated Husband as her primary beneficiary of her 401k.  She did not designate any alternate beneficiaries.   In the process of liquidating Wife’s 401k, we were required to complete a beneficiary affidavit.  The form stated that if the claimant is the spouse no further information about any other family members is necessary so we sent it back leaving blank the questions about children parents and siblings.  The financial institution, however, sent us back the form stating it was incomplete. When I called the institution to clarify what was incomplete, things got interesting.  They explained that they needed me to provide this information about family members of the Husband and not the Wife.  I explained that since Husband outlived Wife, the account proceeds should then become part of his estate to be distributed by the Administrator of his estate.  Husband had no children or siblings and his parents had passed away many years before so in the end, in our case, the outcome was what I believe it should have been anyway - payable to Husband’s estate. But, what they told me still

I have posted many times on this blog about the reasons why you should have a will.  I have also written about certain types of assets that are not controlled by a last will.  One such type is contract property, which is any account that has a payable upon death (POD) designation which overrides the will.  It is important, therefore, to carefully plan whether to choose POD beneficiaries at all and if so, who they should be. In the case of retirement accounts which have income tax implications, because these tax deferred accounts will potentially trigger a large income tax when the plan participant dies, it is especially important to make a careful choice.  A recent case in our office resulted in an interesting conversation about the line of succession to such an account. A wife died and 10 days later her husband died.  They had no children and they left no wills.  Wife had a large 401k thru her employment.  She had completed a beneficiary form designating Husband as the beneficiary, but she did not designate a contingent (alternate) beneficiary.  We received the paperwork required to liquidate the account and transfer it to the rightful recipients. Because the account is contract property, the POD designation takes precedence over New Jersey