Is There Ever an Easy Medicaid Application? Part 4
In last week’s post I continued to tell you about a Medicaid application which our client characterized as easy but turned out to be not so much. One check deposited into an account we were aware of, then led us to 2 other accounts in another bank that we had not been told about. But that didn’t end the search, however, because when we received the statements for these accounts, we had to identify where all money deposited into and withdrawn from these accounts went. Thankfully, there were very few transactions during the time the accounts were open so we were able to document those. That left the opening deposits and the closing withdrawals. The first account was opened before the beginning of our 5 year look back and it was closed and then deposited into the second account. That left the withdrawal of the balance in the 2nd account when it was closed. We went back to Jane’s family to get answers but they had no clue. The closing balance was $5500. In the end we had to accept that we could not account for this money, resulting in a 1/2 month Medicaid penalty. Not so terrible by itself. The damage, however,
Is There Ever an Easy Medicaid Application? Part 3
Continuing the topic of my last 2 blog posts, I was discussing a snag we hit with a Medicaid application - the discovery of at least one account of which our clients had no recollection. When we identify the bank in these situations, that has always been enough for the bank to locate any and all accounts even when we don’t have the account numbers. For some reason, in this case, the bank came up empty. As I stated last week, client tax returns with 1099s will give us the account information. Unfortunately, in this case the clients hadn’t filed a tax return in many years because their income was low enough and they didn’t keep the 1099s. So what to do? Since financial institutions generate 1099s for any account that earns interest and must report it to the IRS, we asked a family accountant to obtain a tax transcript. Once we received it, we were able to identify account numbers for 2 client accounts which we forwarded to the bank. They were then able to find the accounts and produce statements showing all activity for the years in question. The accounts were closed 2 years into our 5 year look back, however, there were some transactions that had
Is There Ever an Easy Medicaid Application? Part 2
In my post last week I began to tell you about an “easy” Medicaid application that suddenly became not so easy. A deposit in one of the applicant’s known accounts led to the revelation that there had been at least one other account unbeknownst to the applicant’s daughter. What this means is that there was other money during the 5 year look back that had to be traced and documented. Because the applicant already spent down the rest of her assets and we had filed the Medicaid application, timing was critical. The failure to provide the required documentation could result in the application being denied for “lack of verification”, meaning it is incomplete. Since the client was already accruing costs in a nursing home, a Medicaid denial acts as a “double whammy”. Not only is there no Medicaid coverage but it also means the facility will continue to bill at the higher private pay rate. So, now the problem was how to get this information? We knew from the check image what bank to contact. In most cases, the bank can search its database if given the check copy. For some reason, in this case the bank could not find it. In part that may have been because the check
Is There Ever an Easy Medicaid Application? Part 1
When I speak with people for the first time about the Medicaid application process - specifically about the 5 year look back and the amount of documentation required - they often tell me that in their case it should be easy. “Mom never had much,” they’ll tell me. But is that necessarily true? Maybe yes, maybe no but we won’t know until we go through the Medicaid process. A recent case in our office illustrates this point. Jane was in a nursing home. Her daughter called about getting Jane on Medicaid. When I asked some questions about her finances, I was told that Jane only had 3 accounts over the past 5 years and it should be a very straight forward application. We sent Jane’s daughter a checklist of the documents needed. There was not much left to spend down so we filed the application within a couple of months when the remaining funds were spent. That’s when the problems began. We discovered money had been deposited into one of the accounts early in the 5 year look back time period. I knew this was going to be a problem and sure enough, the Medicaid caseworker picked up on it as well and asked for the source of the deposit. The daughter had
Yet Another Real Estate Problem – Part 3
In this third post of three, I finish telling you about an executor’s sale of real estate that hit a snag. As I explained last week, the Buyer’s title company concluded that the decedent didn’t own 100% of the property. Instead they said he owned only 50%. The confusion arose from that the fact that at one time the property was owned jointly by the decedent with his brother and mother. When his mother died her name was never removed from the deed. When the brother transferred his interest to the decedent, the title company concluded that the mother’s interest was being transferred at the same time. Since she had already died, this would constitute andimproper transfer. If that deed was invalid then the decedent still only owned 50% at the time of his death. What the title company is ignoring, however, is the fact that when the mother died a transfer of her interest did occur. Jointly held property passes by law at death to the surviving co-owners of that property. Property that is held individually or as tenants in common passes by way of a last will or if there is none than by intestacy. Property held jointly passes by operation of law to the surviving co-owners. The fact that
Yet Another Real Estate Problem – Part 2
As I wrote in my post last week, our client is executor of the estate of a decedent who owned 100% of his home - at least that is what the most recent deed shows. When he found a buyer for the home and the title company did a title search, however, the title company reached a very different conclusion. The home had been purchased by the decedent’s mother. She then executed a deed putting her two sons on the deed with her. They each then owned a 1/3 interest jointly with right of survivorship. That is how title remained until decedent’s mother died. No deed was ever recorded removing the mother’s name from the title but a few years after she died decedent’s brother signed a deed transferring his interest to decedent. That is how title remained at the time of decedent’s death. The title company concluded that the deed to the brother was invalid because it was dated after the mother’s death. The company interpreted the deed as transferring the mother’s interest as well even though she obviously never signed the deed. To add to the set of facts here, the brother died a few months after the decedent. So, if the title company is correct, then the brother’s